Elementor #28727

Moisture Research

The Data Behind the Dryer

The largest known dataset of hearing aid moisture removal — proving that moisture is invisible, universal, and always worth removing.

0
Treatments analyzed
0
Machines across the country
0
Patient-reported improvement
0
Clinical partners nationwide

Based on 129,042 Redux Pro treatments, November 2019 – July 2022. 532 machines at 257 audiology practices (451 locations). Real-world observational data.

The Invisible Problem

The Redux Pro workflow captures what patients experience before and after moisture removal — revealing what they didn’t know they were missing.

“Even when patients said ‘it’s working fine,’ nearly 4 out of 5 heard improvement after treatment. They didn’t know moisture was affecting their hearing.”

Check-In (Before)

Patient Assessment

Audiologist asks: “How is your hearing aid performing?”

Patient-reported condition:
Dead • Weak • Normal

Redux Pro Treatment

Moisture Removed

Vacuum drying with ±0.1 µL precision

2.69 µL Mean moisture removed
Check-Out (After)

Patient Feedback

“Does your hearing aid sound better?”

Patient reports improvement:
Louder • More Crisp • Clearer

Most Common

“Normal” — Working Fine

Patient said their hearing aid was amplifying properly

79.9%
Still heard improvement
48,311 records 2.62 avg µL
Not Loud Enough

“Weak” — Underperforming

Patient said their hearing aid wasn’t loud enough

79.0%
Heard improvement
20,864 records 3.69 avg µL
Inoperable

“Dead” — No Sound

Hearing aid completely stopped working

55.6%
Restored to function
4,997 records 7.47 avg µL

The key insight: Moisture degrades hearing aid performance even when patients don’t perceive a problem. Nearly 80% of “Normal” devices sounded better after treatment.

Three-Zone Clinical Framework

Every valid moisture reading (≥0.5 µL) falls into one of three clinically actionable zones. Click each zone to learn more.

Every zone means moisture was present and removed. Green is not “all clear” — it confirms that even routine moisture accumulation is measurable and that the device benefited from professional treatment.

54%
Green
0.5–1.5 µL
30%
Yellow
1.5–4.0 µL
16%
Red
4.0+ µL
Click a zone for details and counseling language
Green Zone — 0.5–1.5 µL
54%
of readings
87%
improvement

Routine Moisture — Device Benefited From Treatment

The most common result. Measurable moisture was present and successfully removed. Even at this level, patients consistently report clearer sound after treatment. Green does not mean “all clear” — it means daily moisture accumulation is within the routine range.

“Your hearing aids accumulated [X] µL of moisture — routine for daily wear. Even at this level, patients consistently report clearer sound after treatment. This is exactly why regular drying is part of standard care.”
Yellow Zone — 1.5–4.0 µL
30%
of readings
90%
improvement

Moderate Moisture — Warrants Clinical Attention

Moisture exposure beyond routine daily accumulation. May reflect environmental factors (high humidity, exercise), behavioral patterns (inconsistent drying), or a specific moisture event. At this level, moisture is actively degrading device performance.

“We removed [X] µL of moisture — that’s above the routine range. At this level, moisture was affecting your sound quality. Let’s talk about what might be contributing and how daily drying can keep this in the green zone.”
Red Zone — 4.0+ µL
16%
of readings
92%
improvement

Significant Moisture — May Indicate Water Damage

Substantial moisture presence. For context, completely inoperable (“Dead”) devices averaged 7.47 µL. Readings at this level suggest a significant water exposure event or prolonged accumulation without treatment. Devices may have experienced component stress.

“Your hearing aids contained [X] µL of moisture — a significant amount. For comparison, devices that have stopped working entirely average about 7.5 µL. We’ve removed the moisture, but daily drying is essential to prevent this from happening again.”

The difference between zones is the urgency of the conversation, not whether one is needed. Every reading ≥0.5 µL means moisture was present and removed — every treatment is a counseling opportunity.

Success Rate by Moisture Volume

Higher moisture levels correlate with higher perceived improvement — because the performance impact was greater before treatment.

0.5–1.0 µL
87.0%
1.0–2.0 µL
88.9%
2.0–3.0 µL
91.3%
3.0–5.0 µL
92.4%
5.0–10 µL
91.4%
10+ µL
93.7%
Overall Improvement
86.8%

Across all 68,603 treatments with recorded outcomes

Key Pattern
87–94%

Success rates increase with moisture volume — more moisture = more noticeable improvement

Why higher moisture = higher perceived improvement

This pattern is expected: devices with more moisture removed are more likely to show perceptible improvement because the performance impact was greater before treatment. An 87% improvement rate at 0.5–1.0 µL does not mean treatment was less effective — it means there was less perceptible degradation to reverse. The moisture was still present and still removed.

Recovery by Device Condition

Patient-reported device condition at check-in reveals how moisture damage severity affects recovery outcomes.

65.1% of Cases

“Normal”

Patient said device was amplifying properly

79.9%
Improved
48,311
Records
2.62 µL
Avg Moisture
28.1% of Cases

“Weak”

Patient said device wasn’t loud enough

79.0%
Improved
20,864
Records
3.69 µL
Avg Moisture
6.7% of Cases

“Dead”

Hearing aid was completely inoperable

55.6%
Restored
4,997
Records
7.47 µL
Avg Moisture

The “Normal” Insight

Nearly 80% of patients who said their hearing aids were “working fine” still heard improvement after moisture removal. Moisture degrades performance even when patients don’t perceive a problem.

The Preventive Case

Dead devices had 3x the moisture (7.47 µL) but only 55.6% recovery. Once damage becomes severe, full recovery is less likely. This is the strongest argument for preventive drying.

The Preventive Care Shift

As treatment volume grew 95-fold, average moisture dropped 86% — clinics shifted from emergency repair to routine maintenance.

Reactive — Fix When Broken
Preventive — Maintain Daily
Treatment volume
Avg moisture removed (µL)
10.68 µL
2019
471
Launch year
7.63 µL
2020
9,000
+1,810% growth
2.78 µL
2021
75,012
Peak volume
1.46 µL
2022
44,559
Jan–Jul only
95x
Treatment volume growth
(471 → 44,559 in partial year)
86%
Decline in avg moisture removed
(10.68 → 1.46 µL)
96.7%
Process completion rate by 2022
(up from 85.4% in 2019)

In 2019, Redux Pro was primarily used for emergency treatment of damaged devices. By 2022, clinics had shifted to routine preventive maintenance — drying as standard care, not last-resort repair. This is the trajectory Redux aims to accelerate.

Scroll to Top

Your Cart (0)